Malawi is in a strange political deadlock at the moment. Parliament has not convened for months and months because of a neat little snag in the constitution called ‘Section 65’. It would actually be funny if it wasn’t so seriously depressing at the same time. To explain it we must go back in history a little bit, and look at the origin of this impasse.
The year 1994 saw the end of the of the rule of a Dr. Kamuzu Banda, a dictator who had ruled Malawi since its independence in 1963. He had started out as a democratic leader, but pretty soon after his election to the office of president it became clear that he planned to stay there for the rest of his life. Indeed he managed to hang on for 30 years, but then he was forced to resign and call for elections. Exactly how his fall came about is a different story, what is important for our story here is that the 1994 elections were won by a man named Bakili Muluzi of the United Democratic Front. He was reelected in 1999 and when his second - and therefore constitutionally last - term drew to an end he too started to develop a serious wish to remain in office for the rest of his life. After all, one would agree that a job that ‘allows’ one unlimited access to public resources and use them for one’s own benefit is pretty hard to leave behind, wouldn’t one? So first he tried to convince parliament to make him president for life. But they were having none of it. Then he organised a referendum asking the Malawian people to allow him to run for a third term in office. Once bitten twice shy, they too were having none of it. With no options left to hold on to the presidency himself, he proceeded to handpick a successor - the relatively unknown outsider Dr. Bingu wa Mutharika - to run in the elections for the UDF, which they won. But while Muluzi started to get ready to use Mutharika as his marionette for the next 5 years, he got the surprise of his life listening to his protégée’s inaugural speech. In it Mutharika introduced a zero tolerance policy on corruption and declared his intentions to bring to justice all corrupt leaders from the past ten years who had stolen so much money from the public. One can only imagine the shocked outburst of disbelieve and anger this must have caused in Muluzi. The one thing on his mind since that day has been: REVENGE!!! As Muluzi was – and is – still party leader of the UDF he then conspired to throw Mutharika out of the party and thus out of office. Mutharika, not the dimmest of men as you may have gathered by now, made a surprising move. He quickly left the UDF, the party that brought him to power, and started a brand new party of which initially he was the only member. Imagine this: the current President of Malawi is the leader of a party that did not even exist, let alone took part, in the elections that put him in office. And the party that won the elections and put the president in power is now: the opposition. Welcome to Malawian politics.
Pretty soon more Members of Parliament left the UDF to join Mutharika’s new Democratic Progressive Party. Not that this new party had any better or more interesting policies to offer than any of the other parties. ‘Policy’ is not something that Malawian politicians tend to get involved in a lot. Politics is mainly about regional alliances, mudslinging and trying to get your hand in the till. So a few MP’s must have thought it worth the gamble to ‘cross the floor’ as switching parties is called, or more likely someone made it worth their gamble. Mutharika needed this support badly: one cannot rule a country without any support in parliament even if one is the president. But this is where Mutharika’s luck ran out and where the constitutional snag, the by now famous Section 65, came in. Because Section 65 of the Malawian constitution stipulates that any MP who crosses the floor will be thrown out of parliament at the earliest opportunity. Obviously the UDF did not waste time trying to invoke Section 65 by having it put on the parliamentary agenda for debate and submitting a motion that the defecting MP’s would be removed from parliament. However, again Mutharika surprised everyone. Faced with the risk of losing what little support he has in Parliament, Mutharika quite simply ‘suspended parliament’. It seems the man likes to operate on the very edge of democratic possibilities. This all happened last year. The budget for 2008 was passed five months too late in a special ‘one-off’ session of parliament. At the moment it is unclear when Parliament will finally meet again and what will be on the agenda. In the mean time Muluzi and Mutharika are slugging it out through the media. Not in a very sophisticated manner I might add. But then, that is probably a little bit too much to expect after the rather less than elegant events of the past years. For your enjoyment I copied most of a full page spread that the DPP took out in The Daily Times last week to ‘put the record straight’.
The Daily Times, Monday, March 31, 2008
SPECIAL BRIEFING TO MALAWIANS ALL OVER THE WORLD
We hereby present this briefing to all Malawians all over the world in an effort to explain the clandestine campaign being waged against His Excellency the State President Dr. Bingu wa Mutharika both in the electronic and print media. We have reason to believe that opposition United Democratic Front under the auspices of former State President Bakili Muluzi and his bench men are behind this smear campaign. Muluzi who already served his two terms of office but is now an aspirant for the high office has made no secret that he has an important unfinished business meaning to remove Bingu wa Mutharika from power come what may. In his own words Muluzi has stated that this is the only thing on his mind. Most probably out of such desperation he has resorted to tactics that can only be described as tacky and provocative.
ON LINE NYASA TIMES PUBLICATION
Nyasa Times which is domiciled in the United Kingdom has been in the forefront maligning the State President, members of his immediate family, government officials and members of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party. The stories that appear on this on line publication are very novel, defamatory, damaging, disrespectful and full of anger that can easily create tension and distrust in our country. In addition, there is no truth at all in what is being published on Nyasa Times. The stories are not factual, they are unfair, unbalanced and ethically bankrupt.
Nyasa Times has not even been civil in the way it has tackled stories about the President. Opposition leaders should realize that just because one is in the opposition, that is not a licence to be disrespectful to the country’s leadership. Speculation has been rife on Nyasa Times on the health of the State President, which possibly intended to cause unnecessary alarm. But surely, Malawians know that the State President is enjoying the best of health and it is Muluzi instead who has been going for medical check up to the United Kingdom. But the picture being painted by Nyasa Times is as if the contrary was true.
We are seriously monitoring the reports on Nyasa Times and those involved should know that we have the capacity to fight back. We have got our reputation to protect and we are not going to allow an online publication to throw mud at the State President just because someone desperately wants to become president again.
Maize availability
It is customary that maize is always in short supply around February both in Malawi and the region as a whole. This is well known phenomenon in Malawi and there is no way that UDF/Muluzi should claim that there is hunger in Malawi. We are aware of all the many tactics that have been employed to create fear and panic. In all fairness Muluzi should be the last person to comment on maize shortage and the scare for looming hunger.
People of Malawi still have fresh memories that under Muluzi’s leadership people routinely survived on maize husks and green mangoes from as early as August onwards. There were huge quantities of maize being imported and the silos were empty. That is not the case this time around. Yet Muluzi/UDF secretly sold maize to East Africa when the country was without adequate maize. The former president ans his party are deliberately distorting facts and they are unsuccessfully trying to compare the self inflicted crisis they created in their time to the current situation. They are forgetting that Malawians know all too well the meaning of hunger. The situation is being politicized and therefore being blown out of all proportions. In most of the areas crops are maturing and there is a whole array of foodstuffs. Is it right to say we are in a hunger crisis? By the way, what happened to the proceeds of the sale of maize to East Africa during the Muluzi era?
In 2005, 4 million were unable to feed themselves and they had to rely on food aid while in 2006, this figure reduced by 80%to 800,000who benefitted from food aid. The fact that 11 in every 12 people could be described as food secure in 2006 means that the country had attained Food Security. The situation in 2007 was even better as input subsidies helped increase agricultural productivity which led to the largest ever maize crop. But Nyasa Times and UDF would like the world to believe otherwise.
[…]
MULUZI’S LEGACY
Muluzi should refrain from trying to compare his ten years of mismanagement to the four years of President Mutharika’a success story. The former State President should not think that people have forgotten his legacy and how things were in his time which was characterized by chaos and ineptitude.
As an aspirant to the high office there is totally nothing that he can offer than enriching himself. People should not forget that donors walked away from this country and the IMF and World Bank could nit bail us out because of lack of transparency and accountability of the Muluzi administration. There is nothing new he can bring to the country since in the ten years he was on the driving seat nothing much changed for the better. The man just likes making empty promises. We are appealing to Malawians to clearly scrutinize this man and his intentions. The people who he promised to provide jobs he did not and even those that had already worked in the mines such as ex-TEBA employees, his agents embezzled their pension money. Whatever he says must therefore be taken with a pinch of salt.
PRESIDENT DR. MUTHARILA’S ECONOMIC SUCCESS
[Ten paragraphs full of lots of good stuff about Mutharika’s achievements such as lower inflation rate, lower poverty rate, increased export value, etc. etc. etc. ]
CONCLUSION
This briefing is aimed at informing the public of what is going on and to put the record straight. We urge those contributing to the Nyasa Times not to peddle lies and that we reserve the right to seek legal redress if they do not stop.
We have been forced to react to these unwarranted attacks being made on the State President and his government and we will not just standby and look on this a his detractors continue on this futile campaign of misinformation.
Chikumbutso Mtumodzi
STATE HOUSE PRESS OFFICER
LILONGWE
March 25, 2008